The Advertising Empire: Pay to Play vs Play and Pay
The Health Industry Money Trade-off. A short history of the media advertising machine and its marriage to big industry. Money controls all narratives.
The Unreliable Media Strikes Again
November 19, 2016
by Dr. S Grey Cox, Ph.D., ND
“These findings are so troubling that we expected major media outlets in America to sound an alarm, calling for an immediate reevaluation of current preventive health care practices. But 4 years after the publication of our study, this has not happened. Could it be because, according to Robert Kennedy, Jr., about 70% of advertising revenue on network news comes from drug companies? In fact, the president of a network news division admitted that he would fire a host who brought on a guest who led to the loss of a pharmaceutical account. That may be why the mainstream media won’t give equal time to stories about problems with vaccine safety.”
Neil Z. Miller
Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons Volume 21 Number 2 Summer 2016
Once again, we are faced with the fact that the media has an agenda that no longer addresses the needs and concerns of the public. Whether one is a Left-Wing advocate or a Right-Wing advocate, it does not matter as the truth, or lack thereof, had its effect even though the outcome was not intended. During all of this, it is the public that the media pretends to serve. The question is, since the public has been abandoned by the news agencies, who are these so-called "informers" of news serving, and why? It is as plain as the scratching of one palm or another. By simply looking through their incomplete reports and skewed stories, you find a mixed variety of advertisements. And amid those paid time blocks are the true sinister perverts lurking in the background of the control.
In the world of “capitalism”, it is capital (money) that controls commercial information. It controls what you see and what you hear. It controls your food, the air you breathe, and the water you drink, all of which have been declining in quality and value for many over the last 100 years. The media, in reality, is like all businesses, driven by profit instead of truth and morals. In the same sense, you can see that even non-profits such as religious, social, and political entities are driven by capital and not by truth and morals in many cases. So it is very easy to understand that profits are the end “truth” for all of these organizations.
"That being said, it is also true that the media is an extortion operation as well as an extortion victim. This two-way street is a piece of vicious and cutthroat machinery....."
That being said, it is also true that the media is an extortion operation, in addition to being the victim. This two-way street is a piece of vicious and cutthroat machinery that has left the original purpose of the “people’s” media in the dust of a forgotten road, no longer a voice of hope, understanding, and possible direction. The greatest example of this relationship with “capital”, the GOD of “CAPITALISM”, and the truth, visa viz, reporting of the news, is that the truth is only implied as a traditionally vested interest of society, a pretense of some reality that no longer exists, and the salaried (capital guaranteed) reporters of this morass of excrement called news should consider a worthwhile career. The TRUTH is that….. the “NEWS” is really getting “OLD”.
Let me rewind to an example of how the media operates, illustrating the interplay between good and evil. During the age of tobacco interests, the media was interested in providing a vehicle for seduction by the tobacco industry by providing not only lucrative contract ads to promote deadly tobacco products but also the production of programming that presented tobacco as a “cool” pastime. The seductive illusion of the “got it together” anarchist with a cigarette hanging from the mouth was common. The appeal of inclusion into the anti-establishment was adorned with such decorations. It made many “feel” as if they were included or accepted into a group that cared about them. Illusions are all the same.
The government agencies of health and the medical field had been touting the deadly health ramifications of smoking. Of course, the main channel of focus was lung cancer as the fear-mongering center of attention. In reality, the primary concern of American business was the effect of cigarette smoking on the productivity of the populace. There were many studies conducted on the effects of cigarettes on the productivity of labor workers, resulting in a negative impact on corporate profits. Unfortunately, corporations often do not have the same conscience as the majority of mankind, having no soul.
It was the banning of tobacco advertising that turned the tide against the industry. Those in power knew that if the advertising money was denied from the media, then the media would not only be unable to promote tobacco but would also turn on the industry, which they did like wolves in winter. You see, the media had no reason (money) to protect the purveyors of nicotine because the industry could not pay their extortion money. It is the slickest racketeering operation in the country, and nothing is done about it.
Enter the medical/pharmaceutical industry. How many ads related to drugs do you see that advocate a need, but at the same time warn against side effects that could include major health damage or even death? Would anyone in their right mind take some of this stuff....seizures, Tuberculosis, Kidney or Liver Damage, and even death in any variety of ways. Oh yes, you can even go blind! In the above report, it also stated:
“Our study showed that infants who receive several vaccines concurrently, as recommended by the CDC, are significantly more likely to be hospitalized or die when compared with infants who receive fewer vaccines simultaneously. It also showed that reported adverse effects were more likely to lead to hospitalization or death in younger
infants.”
Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons
Volume 21 Number 2 Summer 2016
http://www.jpands.org/vol21no2/miller.pdf
The media also fired salvo after salvo at Donald Trump, who refused to spend any sizeable amount of money for campaign ads compared to the 100s of millions of dollars spent by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Now, what are the odds that the payola potential of Trump would have changed things to some significant degree, at least on some media platforms?
If you are wondering why the polls were so wrong, simply consider how polls manipulate and alter our thinking. Probably as much as electronic voting machines are bulletproof from manipulation, I think not. Even though the media claims there is little or no voter fraud, they fail to report the independent investigations that have shown massive fraud in numerous states. In fact, the terminology, voter fraud, is not the issue. The real issue is election fraud, which is over and above the voter fraud in its importance.
“In the 38,801 VAERS reports we analyzed, 26,408 infants
were younger than six months. After receiving one or more
vaccine doses, 1,623 of those infants died: a mortality rate of
6.1%. The remaining 12,393 infants were between six months
and one year of age. After receiving one or more vaccine doses,
258 of them died: 2.1%. The mortality rate for vaccinated infants
younger than six months was significantly higher than the
mortality rate for vaccinated infants aged between six months
and one year, with an RR = 3.0 (95% CI, 2.6-3.4). Infants who had
an adverse event reported to VAERS were significantly more
likely to be hospitalized or die if they were younger rather than
older at the time of vaccination.”
Next, they will have a vaccination for our minds to vaccinate us from the truth.